Cappitech MiFID II Industry Survey Finds High Percentage of Non-Compliance in Best Execution

Fan Cover Survey Thumbnail-2Cappitech, a leading provider of regulatory reporting and intelligence technology for the financial services industry, today announced the results of a survey of over 100 European buy- and sell-side compliance decision-makers. The survey examined how MiFID II regulation has affected financial services organisations and how these plan to tackle new regulations such as Best Execution and RTS27/28 in order to improve their business processes.

The Cappitech survey found that, despite a legal obligation to comply with Best Execution under MiFID II, 65% of respondents do not monitor trades systematically according to best execution criteria. Furthermore, almost 60% of respondents have no plans to use their Best Execution reports internally, even though the data would improve their execution quality, client offering and ability to make better informed business decisions.

“Many firms still don’t define their best execution policies properly, and many of those that do so don’t have a system to monitor their policies in a systematic fashion,” said Ronen Kertis, CEO and Founder of Cappitech. “Furthermore, the operational processes in many cases continue to be unnecessarily laborious and complex. Industry participants need a single point for all compliance needs across reporting, execution quality analysis, service, ARM and Trade Repository integration and reconciliation.”

Additional Survey Findings
  • More than half of the respondents were not fully compliant with MiFID II’s reporting mandates on January 3rd this year, confirming industry-wide suspicions that large numbers of market participants were struggling in the run-up to the implementation date.
  • Firms are still unclear about which financial instruments fall under MiFID II’s purview from a transaction reporting perspective. ESMA’s Financial Instrument Reference Database (FIRD), conceived to help firms understand their reporting obligations, is complex and confusing.
  • Firms that rolled-out new technology prior to the MiFID II deadline might be paying too much for TCA solutions, which in many cases feature unnecessarily broad functionality, designed expressly for bulge-bracket firms.
To see the full survey results, download the report or view the summary infographic.

 

Share this:

Written By

Trudy Namer

Trudy Namer

Trudy is the Director of Marketing at Cappitech and leads the global marketing strategy within the organization. Capitalizing on over 15 years of B2B and financial services marketing experience, she specializes in a wide range of marketing disciplines including branding, lead generation, digital marketing, public relations, thought leadership positioning and content creation. Prior to Cappitech, Trudy worked at Earnix, a provider of advanced analytics software for the financial services industry; Jumtext, a mobile marketing company and Gems, an award-winning Fund of Hedge Funds. Trudy holds a Business of Commerce degree (Cum Laude) from the University of South Africa and a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Bar Ilan University, Israel.

Recent Posts